Home | Daily Musings | About Us | Contact Us |
Search the Site   Advanced Search »
Sections
Archive
Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su
12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031




email Email to a friend | print Print version |

General Betrayus Loses Track of Iraq Weapons

By Jake on August 08,2007

image

Donald Rumsfeld's Pentagon lost track of 190,000 weapons in Iraq while Gen. David Pretraeus (Betrayus) was in charge of distributing them to the Iraqis. This man is now in charge of operations in Iraq and will be delivering the much-anticipated September report on the Bush surge. What do you bet he loses that, too?

Excerpt:

The Pentagon cannot account for 110,000 of the 185,000 AK47 rifles it gave the Iraqis; 80,000 of the 170,000 pistols; 135,000 of the 215,000 items of body armor; 115,000 of the 140,000 helmets.

According to the GAO, these security-assistance programs are traditionally overseen by the State Department. But during the reign of then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, his department insisted it could provide the flexibility that could best do the job. Those were the days when nobody said no to Rummy, so it came to pass.

But the GAO report chronicled haphazard and often nonexistent property-accounting procedures as the Pentagon rushed to create, arm and equip Iraqi security forces. Pentagon officials told GAO investigators they didn't have enough personnel to keep track of the weapons they were handing out in Iraq and that their computers were inadequate for the task. Defense officials didn't create central records to track the weapons until December 2005.

Responsibility for the massive failure of accountability lies with the general in charge of creating and equipping the Iraqi security forces. It was Gen. David Petraeus, who is now in command of the entire U.S. military effort in Iraq. Petraeus, who until this finding has always enjoyed an excellent reputation in military circles, will be providing that much-awaited Sept. 15 report on the status of the U.S. military effort in Iraq.

 


189 times read

Did you enjoy this article?

1 2 3 4 5 Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00Rating: 5.00 (total 2 votes)